“International child abduction cases—particularly those governed by the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction—are legally and logistically complex. These cases often involve parallel proceedings in two countries, requiring coordination between multiple legal teams, interpreters, and navigating differing legal systems, which can be costly and time-consuming. In the United States, for example, a California family court cannot assert jurisdiction unless one of the parties is a legal resident of the state. Furthermore, when a child has been taken to or retained in a foreign country, U.S. courts generally defer to the courts of the child’s country of habitual residence to determine custody. The primary goal of the Hague Convention is not to decide custody but to return the child promptly to their habitual residence so that custody can be addressed by the appropriate jurisdiction.”
— Elena Giannattasio | Founder, Multi-Jurisdictional Divorce
The HAGUE Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction is a treaty designed to combat international child abduction by a parent or guardian. Its core purpose is to ensure that children who are unlawfully taken across international borders are quickly returned to the country where they habitually reside, so custody matters can be settled in the appropriate jurisdiction.
To invoke the Convention’s protections, several key conditions must be met:
This treaty is not intended to determine custody or visitation rights. Instead, it focuses on returning the child to their home country so that legal custody issues can be addressed by the appropriate authorities there.
WHY OUR
CLIENTS
CHOOSE US?
We’re “not
your average
law firm.“
There are two main avenues available under the Convention for individuals seeking the return of a child:
While foreign court decisions under the Convention are not automatically binding in the U.S., they are generally respected under principles of international comity.
Under Article 3 of the Convention, a removal or retention is considered “wrongful” when:
The Convention does not clearly define “habitual residence,” leading to significant legal debate. However, U.S. and international courts have outlined key principles:
In Feder v. Evans-Feder, for instance, the court emphasized the child’s perspective and level of acclimatization in the location.
Legal custody rights are defined by the law of the child’s habitual residence. Some countries, such as the UK, France, and Australia, interpret the right to determine a child’s place of residence as a custody right—even if a parent lacks full physical custody. Conversely, some U.S. courts have taken a more restrictive approach, notably in Croll v. Croll, limiting custody to those with formal custodial authority.
Even when wrongful removal is established, the Convention allows for limited exceptions that may prevent a child’s return. The parent opposing return bears the burden of proof. The primary defenses include:
Courts may issue return orders with certain conditions or undertakings to safeguard the child and the parent returning with the child, such as:
A parent who fled to another country to evade criminal prosecution in the United States may be barred from bringing a case under the Hague Convention in U.S. courts.
The Hague Convention serves as a vital international framework for addressing cross-border child abductions. While it does not resolve custody disputes, it ensures such decisions are made in the proper jurisdiction. Its procedures are detailed and its exceptions narrow, reflecting the international commitment to protecting children from wrongful international removals.
The HAGUE Convention provides the international process for addressing wrongful removals of children across borders. It does not decide custody; instead, it directs those decisions back to the child’s proper home country. Because the Convention is highly procedural with very narrow exceptions, it functions as an essential safeguard against international child abduction. Working with an experienced international family lawyer ensures that you understand the Convention’s requirements, timelines, and defenses so your child’s rights are protected.
The HAGUE Convention provides the international process for addressing wrongful removals of children across borders. It does not decide custody; instead, it directs those decisions back to the child’s proper home country. Because the Convention is highly procedural with very narrow exceptions, it functions as an essential safeguard against international child abduction. Working with an experienced international family lawyer ensures that you understand the Convention’s requirements, timelines, and defenses so your child’s rights are protected.
Country By Country Information About Child Abduction and Divorce.
By Elena Giannattasio, International Family Lawyer (New York & San Francisco), Multi-Jurisdictional Divorce, PLLC The HAGUE Convention was adopted by Israeli Knesset in 1991, to facilitates the return of minors wrongfully removed from their country of residence, allowing the courts of
By Elena Giannattasio, International Family Lawyer (New York & San Francisco), Multi-Jurisdictional Divorce, PLLC International Parental Child Abduction between the Philippines and the United States Despite the Philippines accession to the HAGUE Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child
By Elena Giannattasio, International Family Lawyer (New York & San Francisco), Multi-Jurisdictional Divorce, PLLC I. Introduction Since the 1997 handover, Hong Kong has remained a formal party to HAGUE Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (1980) (“HAGUE”),
